Wednesday, October 7, 2015

Peer Review

After going through my groups rough drafts there were several things that stood out. Of course this was a rough draft and several things will be expected. Some standard stuff I noticed while I read were grammatical errors, wording, and generally rough prose. As I went through my groups drafts I made corrections and offered advice for possible changes. After this there was a commonality I noticed with 2 out of 3, lack of meeting the 4 page limit. This ultimately can be chalked up to lack of content or just not thinking about the topic enough. I personally suggested to these partners maybe writing a paragraph about how you would change the ad to make it more effective. Another common issue was repeating information several times. I feel that this might be tied in with lack of content but it’s an easy fix. I tried to point this out when I saw it.


There were also several things the drafts did well. All of the drafts broke down the ads pretty well, Monica did an excellent job. I feel like in all the drafts after the first 2 paragraphs the writers really opened up and provided better and more genuine thought. I feel that all the drafts are pretty good in essence however with some small tweaks they can truly be great!

No comments:

Post a Comment